Mining
Forests & Finance has a separate dataset dedicated to hard commodities (mining). This research tracks the finance received by over a hundred mining companies with operations in transition minerals (as well as gold and potash). The coalition also conducts a policy assessment of 30 major banks and investors’ mineral mining policies. This research was carried out in 2025 with credit tracked between 2016 and 2024, and investment as of June 2025.
Transition Minerals
As the necessary transition from fossil fuels to clean energy accelerates, the demand for ‘transition minerals’ such as nickel, cobalt, lithium, and copper is surging. These minerals are used in current renewable energy technologies such as solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles, and batteries. The transition mineral mining sector is expanding rapidly with estimates of enormous flows of finance and investment over the next decade. The large overlap between these mines and Indigenous Territories, peasant lands and high-biodiversity regions means that the risks of serious and irreversible harm are very high. The research conducted in 2025 includes:
Policy assessment of financial institutions policies on mineral mining
See full methodology here.
Recommendations for Aligning Capital with a Just, Equitable and Sustainable Energy Transition
These recommendations have been endorsed by 48 CSOs. For a full list see below.
All these recommendations must be designed and implemented in alignment with international human rights and environmental law, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the Paris Agreement, the Global Biodiversity Framework, International Labour Organisation (ILO) core standards and other multilateral commitments.

Recommendations for Policymakers
To tackle the vast flows of credit and investment to harmful industries such as mining, governments must embed justice and environmental protection into financial regulation. As recommended in the Forests & Finance: Regulating Finance for Biodiversity report (2024) policymakers should: integrate biodiversity, climate and human rights risks into financial regulation; align monetary and fiscal policy with sustainability goals; strengthen mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence; and ensure corporate transparency and accountability. The Forests & Finance Coalition endorses the Principles to Ensure Energy Transition Minerals Advance Justice, Equity and Human Rights which call on governments to:
- Reduce mineral demand equitably
- Protect people and planet
- Support equitable development and tax justice
- Promote Equitable International Trade and Investment
- Ensure Strong United Nations Action on Transition Minerals
Recommendations for Financial Institutions
Financial institutions have a critical role in shaping the energy transition and in ensuring that mining finance respects human rights, protects ecosystems, and contributes to stable, equitable operating environments. They should endorse the Principles to Ensure Energy Transition Minerals Advance Justice, Equity and Human Rights and embed the following standards into their sectoral policies, portfolios, and decision-making:
1. Respect and Uphold Human Rights and International Law
Financial institutions must only provide finance to companies that uphold international human rights law and best practice standards, including:
Indigenous Peoples’ rights and Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC): Applythe principles of the UNDRIP, including the rights to: give or withhold FPIC; decline participation in an FPIC process; exercise self-determination and sovereignty over territories, including the right of Indigenous Peoples in voluntary isolation to remain uncontacted.
Inclusive participation: Respect and uphold the rights of affected countries and communities to participate meaningfully in decisions about mining on or near their territories. This requires inclusive, accessible, and culturally appropriate decision-making processes; recognising FPIC as an ongoing process; and where mining operations breach international human rights law or fail to meet agreed protections, supporting the right of affected communities and governments to seek renegotiation, suspension, or termination of mineral agreements and licenses, in line with the UNGPs and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
Labour rights: Adhere to the ILO core standards, including freedom of association, elimination of forced and child labour, non-discrimination, and safe, fair working conditions, with particular attention to protections for contracted, informal, and migrant workers.
Protection of defenders: Adopt a Zero Tolerance Policy for all forms of violence, intimidation, and reprisals against human rights defenders (HRDs), affected communities, and/or workers.
Access to remedy: Maintain effective, accessible, and independent grievance and remediation mechanisms that are aligned with the UNGPs and provide transparent pathways for communities to remedy.
2. Protect Nature and uphold national and international environmental law
Financial institutions must only provide finance to companies that comply with environmental law and global best practice, including:
No deforestation and ecosystem destruction: Ensure operations do not contribute to deforestation, forest degradation, conversion of natural ecosystems, or the destruction of critical biodiversity areas, protected areas, wetlands, peatlands, or intact forests.
Robust waste management systems: Ban ocean and riverine tailings disposal; require tailings facilities to meet the highest international safety standards in design, construction and maintenance, with a zero-failure objective, independent monitoring and clear accident mitigation and emergency response plans
Protect water sources and aquatic ecosystems: Prevent contamination from mining effluent, acid leaching and other extractive processes. In the event of contamination, make it mandatory to completely restore the affected area and guarantee full reparation to all those affected.
Plan for closure and restoration: Implement comprehensive mine closure and reclamation plans that include restoring ecosystems and repairing environmental damage caused by their operations.
3. Strengthen Due Diligence, Transparency and Accountability
Financial institutions should strengthen their own systems to prevent financing harmful mining activities, including:
Group-level due diligence: Before issuing or renewing any financial services conduct comprehensive due diligence at the corporate group level, as defined by the Accountability Framework Initiative (AFI).
Mineral supply chain traceability: For high-risk supply chains, financial institutions should require disclosure of sourcing data, adopt anti-corruption safeguards, and use independent third-party verification.
Public disclosure of grievances: Disclose all complaints, allegations, and grievances associated with mining clients, along with updates on investigations, remediation, and outcomes.
Independent monitoring: To verify that financed clients comply with human rights, environmental, and anti-corruption standards.
Non-compliance protocols: Publish clear protocols for mining clients with time-bound engagement plans, escalation processes and divestment or termination thresholds.
4. Align Financing with Climate, Nature and Development Goals
Financial institutions should align all mining-related finance with global goals and the best available science, including:
Portfolio emissions reduction: Reduce financed CO₂ by 48% and all GHG by 43% by 2030 (from 2019 baseline), reaching net zero by 2050. Apply the sectoral reduction pathways of a Net Zero Emissions (NZE) scenario with low or no overshot and limited reliance on negative emissions (e.g. IEA NZE scenario).
Client requirements: Only finance companies with credible, time-bound climate transition plans to reduce Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions aligned with the 1.5°C global warming pathway and the best available science.
No fossil fuel lock-in: Exclude finance for fossil fuel-linked mineral supply chains, including captive coal plants. No exceptions should be made for facilities claiming Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) capacity or alleged hydrogen-readiness.
Transparency: Report transparently in line with the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard, or equivalent levels of disclosure. This includes project-level payments to governments (taxes, royalties, and fees), contracts, commodity trading, and beneficial ownership information.
Fair taxation: Ensure clients comply with the letter and spirit of tax laws and regulations in the countries where they operate, publish group structures and country-by-country tax data, and refrain from using tax avoidance schemes.
Public commitment: Align with the UN Principles to guide critical energy transition minerals towards equity and justice.
5. Establish and Enforce Red Lines and Exclusion Policies
Financial institutions must adopt clear exclusion criteria, consistently applied across all services, including:
Exclusions: Companies linked to deforestation, Indigenous rights violations, severe community harm, contamination, tailings mismanagement, violence against defenders, new fossil fuel infrastructure, or repeated / unresolved ESG violations must be excluded.
No-go areas: Align with the Banks and Biodiversity No-Go Areas framework, excluding operations in high-risk ecosystems.
Enforcement: Embed regular review, verification, and enforcement of exclusion policies into all due diligence processes and place non-compliant clients on public watchlists, set time-bound milestones, and terminate finance or divest if violations remain unresolved to ensure accountability.
Endorsers
AEER (action for ecology and people emancipation)
AKSI!
AMAN
Blue Dalian
Business and Human Rights Resource Centre
Center of Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS)
CERAH
Climate Rights International
Cosmopolíticas
Cultural Survival
Earthworks
Fair Finance International
Forest Watch Indonesia
Forum Ökologie & Papier
Global Witness
Greenpeace International
Indonesian Center For Environmental Law (ICEL)
INKRISPENA
Jaringan Kerja Lembaga Pelayanan Kristen di Indonesia (JKLPK)/Christian NGO’s Network in Indonesia
Kaoem Telapak
Koalisi Perempuan Indonesia
Lembaga Informasi Perburuhan Sedane
London Mining Network
MADANI Berkelanjutan
MAM
Perkumpulan hijau
Perkumpulan HuMa Indonesia
PPMAN
Publish What You Pay (PWYP) Indonesia
PUSPAHAM
Rainforest Foundation Norway
Reclaim Finance
Responsibank
Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID)
Sahita Institute (hints)
Satya Bumi
SIRGE Coalition
The Wilderness Society
Trend Asia
Voices
Walhi Jambi
WALHI Kalimantan Tengah
Walhi Maluku Utara
WALHI Nasional
WALHI Riau
Working Group ICCAs Indonesia
Yayasan Penguatan Lingkar Belajar Komunitas (PIKUL)
Yayasan Pusaka Bentala Rakyat
Latest Mining Insights
Explore The Full Dataset In-Depth
Find out who are the main financiers and investors in mining companies
Our Methodology
Learn more about Forests & Finance’s Methodology and Data Collection
This project assesses the financial services received by 22 metal mining companies whose operations may impact natural tropical forests in Southeast Asia, Central and West Africa, and in parts of South America, between 2016 and 2021. It covers mining companies that explore metals, such as iron, copper and zinc. It does not cover coal.
